Technology, IT Performance

Connecting IT and the business

Leadership Article by,

When more than 700 CIOs were asked what tasks and activities would consume them the most in three to five years, they listed “driving business innovation” and “identifying opportunities for competitive differentiation.” However, many a CIO’s reaction to this CIO Magazine’s State of the CIO 2011 research may be, “Tell me something I don’t know—like how to make these things happen.”

Ralph Loura is CIO of Clorox and an IT leader well known for his strategic, far-reaching thinking on critical IT matters. He maintains there are two critical paths to achieving these and other lofty CIO goals. One is to take the steps necessary to prove IT’s true value as a business enabler. And the other is to move aggressively to embed IT directly into the business.

As for the first, evolving IT into a role as business enabler, Loura says you’ve got to first deal with sweeping away niggling and persistent impediments to change.

“(In IT) we are carrying a lot of operational legacy, be it legacy hardware or software, legacy process. Some of it is legacy thinking in the way we structure and deliver systems and value,” Loura states. “We’ve got to continually challenge ourselves to stay current, to stay close to the business, to understand their needs, and then scan the industry for solutions that fit into that need set, as opposed to solutions that fit our paradigm of how we’ve structured delivery in the organization.”

Asked what specific technologies or solutions he feels will forward the cause of IT as a business enabler, Loura wastes little time in singling out services-oriented architecture (SOA).

“(With SOA) it’s a question of how do I take features and functions and capabilities from different disparate systems that were designed and operated in different ways, and bring them together to create a new and different model of a business process or create new insight in the business? SOA, I think, is at the heart of that ability.”

Then there is the mission-critical CIO task of embedding IT directly into the business. Historically this has not been the case, as IT was formed as a centralized, largely administrative entity with tentacles into the business units. Why change now? As it turns out, this gathering trend may be the key to achieving end-to-end business insight to generate competitive advantage in a particular brand set.

“It’s hard to gain insight if you’re at arm’s length from the data and the systems and the processes that support that,” Loura insists. “So it’s really vital that the digital capabilities, the analytics, the insight that can be gained from systems, be used to support that kind of transformation in the business. You can’t do that at arm’s length.”

Again, there are impediments to achieving these IT goals. Perhaps most prominent among them is legacy IT technology.  Most current IT systems are built on large-scale ERP environments and large-scale enterprise applications that have traditionally taken years to deploy, and support time and lifecycles dramatically inconsistent with today’s business.

But the bigger challenge is to sweep aside the human obstacles, Loura feels. “In IT we’ve rewarded and trained people to be risk averse…to build very stable, very controlled systems. Try to tell those same people: Now your job is to run as fast as you can and as be as agile as you can and as creative as you can to help solve some challenges at the edge of the business, as opposed to the core of the business. It definitely takes a different kind of person to really want to run at that front edge, bringing technology to the business.”

(10) (10)

Discussion
Would you like to comment on this content? Log in or Register.
ventis911
stephen agar 1 Point | Fri, 05/27/2011 - 20:34

One of the key issues here is how to enable the wider business tounderstand that there can be different acceptable types of IT system, agile but more prone to flaky excentricity ( un documented featres and plain left that out to deployin time ) and core where stability is critical and change much more difficult costly and slow to achieve.

To square these competing paradigms needs the CIO and all the IT team to be embedded culturaly and goal aligned with the organisation as a whole, an inherent understanding of what "our" business needs and an acceptance that doing things right might also mean doing things different between applications. 

As to the role of SoA, yes of course this is the strategic backbone, but embrace the abilty to say system X is needed but cant be plugged in spend time checking that the mid term and long term consequences of this are not counter productive ( which might include a phase out and replace with SoA compliant if integration or acceptance of function grows)

In highly acquisitive companies three probably wontever be a time when there isnt something crucial outside of the Architecture and being a PITA! so our job in leading IT isnt to try and recode everything to conform, but help colleagues see that like countires IT systems sometimes have to just be neighbours or trading partners not part of the Union.

Embrace some anarchy, the support can be more challenging but the onboarding of more business functions with the same can do attitude will overcome calls of discontent when one system doesnt fully integratewith another, if things changeso substantially that this can not be let to continue a programme with general support will already exist and that makes finding the investment and portfilio time easier too.

 

 

Henry
Henry Smith 2 Points | Mon, 05/23/2011 - 12:57

I agree that IT has been trained to be risk averse. In small IT shops where IT staff wear multiple hats I can see this being a challenge, they are focusing primarily keeping everything up and going. In larger organizations I would hope they have a design team that can work without boundaries and developing the innovations that IT can deliver. I do agree that people need to be focused on to find these innovations, as nowadays with the development of IT almost everything is possible to do online - even apply for cash advance. Here’s an idea for the small IT shops – take one or two of your IT Staff and have them focus on nothing but innovations without boundaries – see what they come up with for three months. This will also give the ability of the other IT staff to learn the roles of the others – which creates crossing training and employee development, as well as doing something new and different. This seems like a win win to me.

jdodge
John Dodge 1496 Points | Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:10

Henry, Welcome to the Enterprise CIO Forum. I like your idea to take two people and have them focus solely on innovation. How many departments do that already? And how IT departments simply cannot afford to lose two people out of operations and development?  

jdobbs
Joel Dobbs 325 Points | Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:52
Very relevant topic. I actually see the outsourcing/offshoring trend of the past few years as an opportunity provided this is used to offload routine operations to a third party who can provide consistently high-quality service. This should result in freeing up a smaller but higher quality IT staff to focus more clearly on partnering with the business. The type of person needed for these roles is quite different from the traditional risk-averse IT person. Organizations will need to develop clear competencies for these new roles and use these to hire, evaluate and reward their staff. Some painful personnel decisions will likely be needed in order to be successful as some staff members will not be able to fulfill these new roles.
Goddardd
Doug Goddard 123 Points | Tue, 04/26/2011 - 18:24

After scanning the globe in search of the cheapest IT resources they could find, the past few decades, isn't it somewhat strange that corporations would now be looking to IT to be the source of business innovation as well? I suppose they still expect it to be as cheap as possible too? What role will the high priced talent play now?

jdodge
John Dodge 1496 Points | Tue, 04/26/2011 - 18:58

Doug,

Good observation on an obvious contradiction. That would be a great blog post and could provoke some great discussion.

Goddardd
Doug Goddard 123 Points | Wed, 04/27/2011 - 11:58

The next contradiction will be when they start balming the IT "innovators" for delivering unsecure, undocumented, poorly scalable applications, after insisting IT is too risk averse and inflexible, demanding new applications be delivered in weeks or days, if not immediately. It will be interesting when the kind of scrutiny now applied to IT starts being applied to other departments, should that ever happen. 

jdodge
John Dodge 1496 Points | Wed, 04/27/2011 - 12:53

Doug,

This is a resonant topic. Can you do a blog post about it start a discussion? IT starved for so many years and now must be the innovator....

Goddardd
Doug Goddard 123 Points | Wed, 04/27/2011 - 15:42

I'll see what I can throw together.

jdodge
John Dodge 1496 Points | Wed, 04/27/2011 - 12:33

Doug,

This is a resonant topic. Can you do a blog post about it start a discussion? IT starved for so many years and now must be the innovator....

chelsyJ
chelsy jefferson 0 Points | Tue, 04/26/2011 - 06:52
Comment has been removed by administrator.